Systematic Review of Ivermectin as a Potential Anticancer Agent: Preclinical Evidence, Mechanisms of Action, and Emerging Clinical Insights
Abstract
Background: Ivermectin, an established antiparasitic agent, has shown promising anticancer properties in preclinical studies. This systematic review synthesizes the current evidence from PubMed and related databases on ivermectin's role in cancer, including mechanisms, preclinical efficacy, and limited clinical data up to August 2025.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed using the terms "ivermectin AND cancer," yielding 390 results. Additional searches filtered for systematic reviews (0 results) and clinical trials (0 dedicated results in PubMed, but emerging trials identified via ClinicalTrials.gov and web sources). Web searches targeted reviews and trials from 2024-2025. Inclusion criteria: studies on ivermectin's anticancer effects; exclusion: non-cancer applications (e.g., COVID-19). Data were narratively synthesized due to the absence of meta-analyzable clinical trials.
Results: Preclinical studies dominate (n≈350), demonstrating ivermectin's inhibition of proliferation, induction of apoptosis, reversal of drug resistance, and targeting of cancer stem cells across cancers like breast, colorectal, and prostate. Mechanisms include mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS production, and pathway inhibition (e.g., PAK1/Akt, Wnt/β-catenin). No systematic reviews or meta-analyses were found. Clinical evidence is limited to ongoing phase I/II trials (e.g., ivermectin with pembrolizumab for triple-negative breast cancer; NCT05318469) and anecdotal reports, with no published RCT results confirming efficacy. Safety at antiparasitic doses is established, but higher anticancer doses pose risks.
Conclusions: While preclinical data support ivermectin's repurposing for cancer, human evidence remains insufficient. Rigorous clinical trials are needed to validate its potential, particularly in combination therapies.
Introduction
Ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from avermectin, is widely used for parasitic infections and has a well-established safety profile at standard doses (200–400 μg/kg). Interest in its anticancer potential emerged from in vitro observations of antiproliferative effects, prompting investigations into repurposing. Preclinical studies suggest multifaceted mechanisms, including apoptosis induction and drug resistance reversal, but translation to clinical settings lags. This systematic review aims to evaluate the evidence base, highlight gaps, and discuss implications for future research, incorporating data up to 2025.Methods
Search Strategy
Searches were performed on PubMed (August 13, 2025) using "ivermectin AND cancer" (390 results). Filters applied: systematic reviews (0 results), clinical trials (0 dedicated results). Supplementary web searches queried "ivermectin cancer systematic review OR meta-analysis 2024 OR 2025" and "ivermectin cancer clinical trial results 2024 OR 2025." ClinicalTrials.gov was reviewed for ongoing trials.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Included: Preclinical (in vitro/in vivo), review, or clinical studies on ivermectin's anticancer effects. Excluded: Non-English articles, non-cancer foci (e.g., COVID-19), duplicates.
Data Extraction and Synthesis
Data extracted: study type, cancer type, mechanisms, outcomes. Due to heterogeneity and lack of RCTs, narrative synthesis was employed. Risk of bias was qualitatively assessed (e.g., preclinical publication bias).
Results
Study Characteristics
Mechanisms of Action
Ivermectin exerts anticancer effects via:
- Apoptosis and Autophagy Induction: Mitochondrial disruption and ROS generation.
- Cell Cycle Arrest: Targets FOXA1/Ku70 in prostate cancer.
- Drug Resistance Reversal: Inhibits P-glycoprotein, enhancing chemotherapy sensitivity (60-fold in leukemia).
- Cancer Stem Cell Targeting: Downregulates NANOG/SOX2/OCT4.
- Immunomodulation: Induces immunogenic cell death, synergizing with PD-1 inhibitors.
Preclinical: Consistent tumor growth inhibition (e.g., colorectal metastasis via Wnt/β-catenin). Synergy with paclitaxel in high-grade cancers (2024).
Clinical: No completed RCTs with results. Ongoing trials explore combinations (e.g., with pembrolizumab for TNBC). Anecdotal use in rural settings shows self-medication but no controlled outcomes. A 2025 phase I/II abstract suggests potential safety in combination therapy, but efficacy data pending.
Safety
Safe at low doses; higher doses risk neurotoxicity. No major adverse events in cancer-parasite co-morbidity cases.
Discussion
Preclinical evidence robustly supports ivermectin's anticancer potential, particularly in reversing resistance and enhancing immunotherapy. However, the lack of clinical trials limits recommendations. Misinformation proliferates, with unsubstantiated claims fueling off-label use. Limitations: Publication bias in preclinical data; dose translation challenges. Future directions: Prioritize RCTs in drug-resistant cancers.
A compilation of more than 200 case reports was published on OneDayMD.com, detailing individual experiences with ivermectin and fenbendazole or mebendazole as a cancer treatment, sourced from social media, patient testimonials, and clinical communications between 2023-2025. These reports were categorized by cancer type, and outcomes were assessed based on self-reported measures such as tumor regression, remission status, and overall survival.
The anecdotal reports included in this compilation cover a variety of cancer types and describe self-reported outcomes following the use of ivermectin and fenbendazole or mebendazole. These findings, while compelling, must be interpreted cautiously due to the inherent limitations of the data sources.
The anecdotal nature of these reports precludes definitive conclusions about the efficacy of ivermectin and fenbendazole as a definitive cancer treatment. However, the consistency of positive outcomes across diverse cancer types suggests a potential biological effect that merits further investigation.
The pattern of case reports also suggests that ivermectin and fenbendazole may exhibit broad-spectrum anticancer properties.
It is imperative that patients consult healthcare professionals before considering ivermectin and fenbendazole as a treatment option. Unsupervised use may lead to unforeseen drug interactions or adverse effects.Conclusion
Ivermectin holds promise as a repurposed anticancer agent based on encouraging preclinical data demonstrating multiple mechanisms that can inhibit cancer cell growth and overcome drug resistance. However, clinical validation through rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains urgently needed to confirm its efficacy and safety in cancer patients.
As always, patients should consult closely with their supportive healthcare provider team before making any treatment decisions, as personalized care and careful monitoring are essential to optimize outcomes and minimize risks.
Acknowledgments
First draft review was generated using Grok AI (on behalf of xAI Research Team) for literature synthesis.
Comments
Post a Comment